LVT Helping Local Jurisdictions to Secure Revenue Stability
Center for the Study of Economics - Company Message
RSS Follow Become a Fan

Delivered by FeedBurner


Recent Posts

LVT in Los Angeles? Op-Ed says go for it.
Welcome to the Zany World of NYC's Property Tax
Land Value Taxation in Jamaica: Now More Than Ever
Part 1, Land Value Taxation: Politics, Persuasion, and Practicality - A How-To
2016: Another Year of Advances and Retrenchment

Most Popular Posts

Noted UK Think Tank: Tax Land Values
Eliminating the property tax? It must not happen, but we’ll see what happens.
Altoona, PA: City tax wholly on land values = normality
Land Value Tax in Britain: Progress While the Rear Guard Digs In
Dr. Herbert Barry's Proposal to Really Reassess Allegheny County

Categories

Act 47
Affordable Housing
Africa
Agricultural Policy
Allegheny County
ALTER
Altoona
Assessment
Australia
Australian Capital Territory
Baltimore
Berkshire
California
Canberra
Clairton
Connecticut
Connecticut General Assembly
Current News Item
de Blasio
Economic Development
Economic Policy
Economic Rent
Economist
Ed Vargas
Education
EPA
Federal Tax Policy
Fiscal Policy and Taxes
Frederick
Free Markets
Gentrification
George Osborne
Global Taxation
Harrisburg
Hartford
Healthy Communities
Housing
Housing Policy
Hurricane Sandy
India
Ireland
Jamaica
Jeffrey Berger
Jimmy Tayoun
Justin Skariah
Kenyatta Johnson
Lancaster
Land Policy
Land Value Tax
Lanesborough
Larry Deutsch
Law and the Constitution
Legislation
Len Fasano
Liberal Democrats
Local Government
Los Angeles
Maria Quinones-Sanchez
Martin Looney
Maryland
Massachusetts
Matt Ritter
Matthew Ritter
Mayor Rick Gray
Michael Kinsley
Michigan
Millbourne
Model Legislation
Monroe County
Montreal
Moonachie
Namibia
National Tax Policy
New Jersey
New London
New York City
NY
Oregon
Parking and Transportation
Patricia Dillon
Pennsylvania
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Portland
Property Assessment
Property Tax Reform
Public Health
Public Opinion
Public Resources
Public Works
Regional Tax Base Sharing
Regionalism
Regressive
Rhode Island
Rochester
Roland Lemar
Sales Taxes
Scranton
Senator Jan Malik
Sin Taxes
Smart Growth
Soda Tax
Taiwan
Tax Exemption and Abatment
Thomas Piketty
Titusville
Tom Kramer
Transportation Funding
Transportation Policy
Uncategorized
United Kingdom
Urban Blight
Urban Rejuvenation
Urban Tax Policy
Vince Cable
Wage and Income Taxes
Wales
Wealth
Wilson Goode Jr.
powered by

Incentive Taxation

LVT Helping Local Jurisdictions to Secure Revenue Stability

What is it that has led many cities over the years to seek revenue stability through “economically sensitive taxes” - business, income, real estate transfer, sales, utility, and hotel taxes? There have been a multitude of responses and assumptions made over time relative to each jurisdiction’s leadership and public policy. Suggestions of extreme short sightedness and inertia are excuses not actionable explanations.

According to the 
US State Government Tax Collections Summary Report: 2010,the 2007 Census of Governments reported that 71.4 percent of local tax revenue was property tax. “Property taxes were one of the few categories that increased in 2010, up 10.0 percent to $14.3 billion.”

Clearly, local governments are dependent on property tax revenue. State by State across this nation, city officials have enacted legislation to increase property tax rates. Was that the best solution? Ignoring the political popularity of the issue and focusing on the core issue of tax policy, it may have been.

Unfortunately, the structure of most local government property tax policy is misguided. The most popular mechanics employed is applying the same percentage rate to tax land as well as buildings and improvements. On the surface, it appears to be a 50/50 split yet in reality, those taking the least care of their property or holding the land vacant are reaping the most benefit. Continuing to tax buildings at a higher rate than land will cause many local governments to experience short falls due to the adverse effects of declining property values, which comes with a considerable lag relative to real estate cycles.

Implementation of LVT (land value tax) –taxing land at a higher rate than buildings – takes the burden of the property tax off most home owners and places it back on the vacant lot owner whose neglect of the land is creating a higher demand on the community’s public services.
Compactness and Density

0 Comments to LVT Helping Local Jurisdictions to Secure Revenue Stability:

Comments RSS

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Website:
Comment:
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Post Comment