An enemy of the state? Philadelphia developer treads on an Empire of Dirt
Center for the Study of Economics - Company Message
RSS Follow Become a Fan

Delivered by FeedBurner


Recent Posts

Part 1, Land Value Taxation: Politics, Persuasion, and Practicality - A How-To
2016: Another Year of Advances and Retrenchment
Part 2 - Land Value Taxation: Politics, Persuasion, and Practicality - A How-To
Podcast Features Millbourne, PA, LVT aids town in fiscal rebirth
Hartford Connecticut Explores Land Value Tax to Battle Parking Lot Blight

Most Popular Posts

Noted UK Think Tank: Tax Land Values
Eliminating the property tax? It must not happen, but we’ll see what happens.
Altoona, PA: City tax wholly on land values = normality
Land Value Tax in Britain: Progress While the Rear Guard Digs In
Dr. Herbert Barry's Proposal to Really Reassess Allegheny County

Categories

Act 47
Africa
Agricultural Policy
Allegheny County
ALTER
Altoona
Australia
Australian Capital Territory
Baltimore
Berkshire
Canberra
Clairton
Connecticut
Connecticut General Assembly
Current News Item
de Blasio
Economic Development
Economic Policy
Economic Rent
Economist
Ed Vargas
Education
EPA
Federal Tax Policy
Fiscal Policy and Taxes
Frederick
Free Markets
Gentrification
George Osborne
Global Taxation
Harrisburg
Hartford
Healthy Communities
Housing
Housing Policy
Hurricane Sandy
India
Ireland
Jeffrey Berger
Jimmy Tayoun
Justin Skariah
Kenyatta Johnson
Lancaster
Land Policy
Land Value Tax
Lanesborough
Larry Deutsch
Law and the Constitution
Legislation
Len Fasano
Liberal Democrats
Local Government
Maria Quinones-Sanchez
Martin Looney
Maryland
Massachusetts
Matt Ritter
Matthew Ritter
Mayor Rick Gray
Michael Kinsley
Michigan
Millbourne
Model Legislation
Monroe County
Montreal
Moonachie
Namibia
National Tax Policy
New Jersey
New London
New York City
NY
Oregon
Parking and Transportation
Patricia Dillon
Pennsylvania
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Portland
Property Assessment
Property Tax Reform
Public Health
Public Opinion
Public Resources
Public Works
Regional Tax Base Sharing
Regionalism
Regressive
Rhode Island
Rochester
Roland Lemar
Sales Taxes
Scranton
Senator Jan Malik
Sin Taxes
Smart Growth
Soda Tax
Taiwan
Tax Exemption and Abatment
Thomas Piketty
Titusville
Tom Kramer
Transportation Funding
Transportation Policy
Uncategorized
United Kingdom
Urban Blight
Urban Rejuvenation
Urban Tax Policy
Vince Cable
Wage and Income Taxes
Wales
Wealth
Wilson Goode Jr.
powered by

Incentive Taxation

An enemy of the state? Philadelphia developer treads on an Empire of Dirt

The Name of the Place Is I Like it Like That: 20th and Annin Streets, Point Breeze

There's neighborhood in Philadelphia called Point Breeze.  By any measure, it’s been abandoned and abused by the economy, government and the larger community for decades.  The neighborhood itself is essentially no longer owned by the people that live there. 





























Point Breeze: Overwhelmed by absentee owners

It's not surprising that residents who are left see how fragile things are, and can't be blamed for being suspicious of change.  There's been a lot of betrayal.

Point Breeze: Inventory of Vacant Lots

Enter Ori Feibush, a developer active (and who lives) in this community liberally sprinkled with vacant lots both privately owned or government owned.  Mr. Feibush is not a particularly huge builder, unlike bigger entities and nonprofits who march untrammeled through Philadelphia.



One objectively good thing he's done is to protect both his investment and the community by fixing up a vacant lot owned by the city.  The trash strewn lot was cleaned up, new trees were planted, and a lot of the people in the area seem to like it.  It's definitely an improvement, and considering the neglect by the city of Philadelphia towards its public inventory of assets and land, seemed like a natural thing to do.  



For his temerity, the city is going after him, and essentially wants him to restore the lot back to its Dresden-like state. Something’s out of whack here. A property owner taking measures to protect their property value by sprucing up a value-reducing vacant lot generally does not end up in the crosshairs of the government. It happens all over Philadelphia.

Mr. Feibush is not particularly beloved by some Point Breeze activists. They fear gentrification, and there is always some justification when one is limited in income and your property values even hint of going up. It's paradoxical but understandable to want to continue to live as you have.

At UrbanTools, we've discussed the issue with local activists, and have discussed in particular how the land value tax could help residents even with people returning to Point Breeze and therefore increasing values.  Basic Homestead exemptions would also go a long way to solving the divisiveness, and perhaps creating a new and better community from the diversity sprouting up.

Generally this has not been playing out well for the city. Technically, they are correct that Mr. Feibush has no right to "trespass."  Don't think the city was stupid, they know what they are doing, it is just hard to understand who they're doing it for.

Are they are trying to intimidate this guy because he is rolling up his sleeves and getting the job done? Perhaps; millions of dollars of public investment over the years have really not done anything to make Point Breeze a better place to live for everybody.

Any city that wants growth has to allow it under conditions acceptable to the community and to the law. A city has to help markets work, and markets come in many forms. The Great Society model of revitalization has for the moment run out of steam and money.   If they don't want Mr. Feibush to have the land for whatever reason (and he claims to have asked to buy it) , at least sell it or give it to someone who will use it.

City-owned land is held in trust for all citizens, yet it appears the City believes it should remain an Empire of Dirt.

1 Comment to An enemy of the state? Philadelphia developer treads on an Empire of Dirt:

Comments RSS
Joe Casey on Saturday, September 15, 2012 9:45 AM
Thank you Mr. Feibush for cleaning up a city owned lot. Please buy the lot and more from the city. The city employee who brought action against Mr. Feibush should be cleaning up city owned lots instead of discouraging private efforts to clean up the mess. Is the city afraid of squatters siezing lots and setting up squatter favelas that are nicer than the neigborhoods? Philadelphia need s to clean up its act or it will continue to be abandoned by the population. Give the lots away and then tax them.
Reply to comment

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Website:
Comment:
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Post Comment