Property tax caps for user fees; what could be better? Almost anything
Center for the Study of Economics - Company Message
RSS Follow Become a Fan

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recent Posts

LVT in Los Angeles? Op-Ed says go for it.
Welcome to the Zany World of NYC's Property Tax
Land Value Taxation in Jamaica: Now More Than Ever
Part 1, Land Value Taxation: Politics, Persuasion, and Practicality - A How-To
2016: Another Year of Advances and Retrenchment

Most Popular Posts

Noted UK Think Tank: Tax Land Values
Eliminating the property tax? It must not happen, but we’ll see what happens.
Altoona, PA: City tax wholly on land values = normality
Land Value Tax in Britain: Progress While the Rear Guard Digs In
Dr. Herbert Barry's Proposal to Really Reassess Allegheny County


Act 47
Affordable Housing
Agricultural Policy
Allegheny County
Australian Capital Territory
Connecticut General Assembly
Current News Item
de Blasio
Economic Development
Economic Policy
Economic Rent
Ed Vargas
Federal Tax Policy
Fiscal Policy and Taxes
Free Markets
George Osborne
Global Taxation
Healthy Communities
Housing Policy
Hurricane Sandy
Jeffrey Berger
Jimmy Tayoun
Justin Skariah
Kenyatta Johnson
Land Policy
Land Value Tax
Larry Deutsch
Law and the Constitution
Len Fasano
Liberal Democrats
Local Government
Los Angeles
Maria Quinones-Sanchez
Martin Looney
Matt Ritter
Matthew Ritter
Mayor Rick Gray
Michael Kinsley
Model Legislation
Monroe County
National Tax Policy
New Jersey
New London
New York City
Parking and Transportation
Patricia Dillon
Property Assessment
Property Tax Reform
Public Health
Public Opinion
Public Resources
Public Works
Regional Tax Base Sharing
Rhode Island
Roland Lemar
Sales Taxes
Senator Jan Malik
Sin Taxes
Smart Growth
Soda Tax
Tax Exemption and Abatment
Thomas Piketty
Tom Kramer
Transportation Funding
Transportation Policy
United Kingdom
Urban Blight
Urban Rejuvenation
Urban Tax Policy
Vince Cable
Wage and Income Taxes
Wilson Goode Jr.
powered by

Incentive Taxation

Property tax caps for user fees; what could be better? Almost anything

Tax Caps and User Fees: Caution Needed

Six Houses all in a row, assessed at the same value of $100,000 at a tax rate of 1%. Taxes still rise, while local government seeks alternative funds in flat fees for services, such as trash pick up.

Regressivity is a more common outcome of user charges than is commonly acknowledged. That ought to change. City services based on value (i.e. a user charge on publicly created land values) can be made more progressive than resorting to invisible charges or flat fees.

An ever-more-common urban finance scenario: Homeowners are upset about tax increases every year. The specter of those unable to pay (the "poor widow") provides ammunition for unflattering press, angry citizens and increased agitation from opponents. A natural reaction in the United States over the past 30 years has been to “do something”.

This is the root of most property tax limitation movement from Prop 13 in California Prop 2 1/2 in Massachusetts, New Jersey’s recent 2% annual tax increase in property taxes, and late but loudly to the game New York State's 2% annual cap. A victory for the poor and middle class? Not quite.

Government, particularly local government, is actually quite sensitive to the needs and desires of its citizens. Restricted by tax caps, other means are used to keep revenue flowing for parks, garbage pickup, and all the various services that constituents demand.
So, government finds other ways to keep the tap running, but in ways that are nearly invisible: borrowing (paying off the principal and interest is put off until everybody involved is long gone), hidden taxes – usually the sales tax – or the ever-growing popular option “fee-for-service.”

The economically impoverished town of Clairton Pennsylvania provides a simple explanation of how this works. Homeowners and business pay for how much water they use. Sounds almost fair enough. Leave the bathwater running all day long you pay more. But what’s really creating an issue and angst is another part of the water service: a flat fee. For residents, it’s $50 a month, whether you are a long retired steel worker who has little income or somebody making hundred thousand dollars a year. For business, you could be struggling storefront shop or a thriving pizza delivery and you pay $100 a month.

6 Comments to Property tax caps for user fees; what could be better? Almost anything:

Comments RSS
psychology assignment help on Saturday, May 19, 2018 5:53 AM
I have purchased many products from your site.Your blog is really informative and its good to know that you can be best choice for top essay writing services online.You should consider this also.Thanks.
Reply to comment

write my on Saturday, July 28, 2018 5:39 AM
Wow! This is a very enjoyable moment that music again in western Montana. I hope you did very well perform at this event. A news is sounding here that coming day you nail and rock the stage.
Reply to comment

top canadian writers on Thursday, August 02, 2018 2:02 AM
If you are getting rid of these types of tax issues by paying a small account then it seems to be a fare deal to every businessmen. It sure has been good for drawing the attention of every concern firm.
Reply to comment

warm hoodies on Monday, August 27, 2018 7:06 AM
We are always willing to hire the professional to handle the cases in which tax issues are being involved. It is only that they are having better awareness to handle the things which are being an assessed.
Reply to comment

tank trouble games on Wednesday, October 24, 2018 3:08 AM
Here you can have a great website for Tank Trouble free online tank games and these games are of fun games. These games do not require any download or registration process.
Reply to comment

Madeline on Saturday, December 01, 2018 7:17 AM
Really good post !! thanks to share blog commenting list…
Reply to comment

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Post Comment